So we were at the West Coast dog run today and it was very crowded with lots of dogs, and alot of small/medium sized ones. Then this German Shepherd comes in with an Indian guy and his lady friend unmuzzled. Mother told the guy that a GS needs to be muzzled in public, but the guy was defensive and a little rude. Mother thought him very irresponsible and inconsiderate. She also thought him very stupid because he kept asking “Why? Is my dog biting your dog?”. What? Wait until I get bitten before you put a muzzle on? What good will that do? Mother would be too busy whacking the GS with any thing on hand and then going after your damn balls. Dumbass.
Look. I love German Shepherds. Mother loves them too. She would want one if she had the space. She doesn’t wholly agree with the muzzling laws because she knows that every dog is different even if from the same breed. But they are there because of certain traits in the breed and data collected of attacks over years and jurisdictions – they are there basically because history has shown that there is a higher tendency of attacks from such dogs. How the attacks happened is unknown but they happened, which shows a greater potential from a particular breed. Sure, there are some great GS out there. Uncle Kab’s GSs are terrific. They are amazingly well trained but even Uncle Kab agrees that GS owners are doing a disservice to the breed and other such breed owners by flouting the laws and deliberately being inconsiderate to others.
Mother says she’s cool if the GS is unmuzzled but leashed, like on walks, because the owner still has control over the dog. But she’s not cool with a GS running off leash without a muzzle because the owner may have no control over the dog at all. She doesn’t know the dog but more importantly she doesn’t know the owner, she doesn’t know if the dog is well trained or socialised – just like all other dogs in the dog run. BUT the difference here is that the other dogs in the dog run are breeds which haven’t shown a propensity to attack. While Mother knows all dogs can bite and she’s always on the look out, she’s not going to discount the GS and statistics. Better to be safe than sorry. She doesn’t need an additional thing to worry about. With so many small dogs in the dog run, the GS could easily kill any one of them. Not just me! (ever heard of prey drive? resource guarding (he had a ball)?) Yes, the GS may be super sweet and docile and won’t hurt a fly. That’s great, but it’s still against the law not to muzzle your dog in public isn’t it? Why can’t the guy just muzzle his dog and let him play with us? Oh wait. The GS lady owner said it was inhumane. Pfft. What nonsense. A muzzle is like a leash. It’s not inhumane unless you never take it off. Some dogs have been conditioned to LOVE their muzzle because muzzle = going out. The GS can still have a good time. While dogs have been known to be able to inflict a bite through the muzzle, those tend to be less serious since the dog can’t get it’s jaws wide enough to get a good grip.
Mother has heard too many stories of dogs being attacked (poor Nigel) to take this sort of thing lightly. She’s always watching the dogs in the run and noting which I should stay away from (today was a black mixed medium sized dog that showed signs of dog-dog aggression) and she won’t hesitate to step in to protect me because a single bite can mean death to me (eeps!) or a permanent injury that I may never heal from. Prevention is better than cure, especially where here, there is a possibility that there many be no cure, unless someone finds a way to revive the dead. She wasn’t just doing it for me anyway. She wouldn’t want any dog owner to have to suffer the consequences of an attack. She knows it will be too painful. She herself worries constantly when we’re with other dogs, coz you just never know!
Furthermore, if the GS DOES attack any dog or person, it’s just going to add to the number of GS attacks and the Agri-food and Veterinary Authority may find it necessary to impose the same strict and expensive rules that it is planning for rottweilers. Why would any GS owner want that? Why not minimize the risks, put other people at ease about the breed and prevent further bad rep to the breed?
Mother says if they didn’t want to muzzle the dog but want the dog to run free and play ball or whatever in a wide open field (who wouldn’t want that for their dog?), go to the dog run very early or very late where there is no one else in the place. That way you can do what you want without being inconsiderate to other people. That’s what Mother would do if she got one because she knows that while she may know her dog, others don’t and will worry. Mother was at WCDR once on a weekday afternoon and we had a good run alone then a pitbull terrier came in – another breed that must be muzzled, but it wasn’t. The owner let the dog loose near the gates, but he saw that I was made to sit next to Mother while Mother eyed him like a hawk and he very courteously leashed his dog as they walked past us to the far side of the dog run. No, the pit bull terrier wasn’t muzzled, but the owner was responsible and considerate. He went when he thought no one else will be there (except Mother who took leave from work that Friday afternoon) and he leashed his dog (and hence could control it) as he walked past us. Mother didn’t tell him to muzzle his dog because we left (we were about to go anyway) and he had the place all to himself.
Grandpa snapped pics of the dude and his GS and on the way out (the GS and couple didn’t stay much longer after Mother approached them – they played a few games of fetch), the GS guy also snapped a picture of Mother. Mother and Grandpa wanted to ask him if he wanted them to pose for the picture because really, they didn’t do anything wrong (and Mother really is the type who would stand up for what she thinks is right, she’s got quite the big mouth and thick skin and she really doesn’t care what people think so long as I am kept safe). They just told the guy what the law says (and what was conveniently printed on the board outside the gates of the park). Ignorance of the law is no defence. Mother says she’d do it again if it’s called for.
